Appoint us
Reader looking for the EU representative named in a privacy notice

REP27 · Privacy notice wording

Articles 13(1)(a) and 14(1)(a) GDPR

The privacy notice wording for your EU representative.

The designation is the private half of Article 27; the notice is the public half. A signed mandate that nobody can find does not give a data subject in Portugal anyone to write to, which was the entire purpose of the article. This page sets out where the wording goes, what it must contain, and the five formulations we most often find that do not work.

Where the EU representative belongs in a privacy notice under Article 13(1)(a) and Article 14(1)(a) GDPR
Two articles, two situations, both requiring a name and a contact address.

What the wording has to contain

A legal entity

The registered name of the company acting as representative — not a brand, not a department, not a country.

An address in the Union

A postal address in a Member State. This is what makes the representative addressable by an authority.

A contact route

An email address or web form that a data subject can use without an account, in a language they can use.

The role, stated

Saying the entity acts as representative under Article 27 removes any doubt about what its relationship to you is.

The five wordings that fail

Five privacy notice wordings that fail Article 27: generic compliance claims, naming a DPO, giving a warehouse address, referring to lawyers, versus a valid formulation
All five taken from public notices read during free checks.

The fourth is the most interesting: companies that genuinely have counsel in Europe assume that suffices. Unless the firm has accepted the mandate in writing and is named as representative, it does not.

A wording that works

Structure it as identity, address, route, role — in that order, so a reader skimming finds the name first.

ElementExample content
EntityThe registered company name of your representative
AddressStreet, postal code, city and Member State
ContactA dedicated email address or web form
RoleActing as representative under Article 27 of the GDPR
PlacementIn the identity section, under both Article 13 and Article 14 headings
We generate this text for you when the designation is issued, in every language your site publishes, so it can be pasted rather than drafted.

Why this is the part regulators see

Of everything Article 27 requires, the notice is the only element visible without contacting you. A supervisory authority conducting a sweep, a buyer running due diligence and a data subject looking for somewhere to complain all start in the same place and reach a conclusion in seconds.

It is also the cheapest thing to fix. The mandate takes a day; publishing the wording takes minutes, and until it is published the designation does no work at all.

The mistake that survives even after appointing

Roughly one in five companies that run our free check has a valid designation and a privacy notice that does not mention it. They have paid for the obligation and left the public half unfinished.

The reason is usually organisational rather than legal. The designation is bought by legal or by the person handling compliance; the privacy notice is edited by marketing or by whoever owns the website. Nobody hands the wording across, and the certificate goes into a drive folder where no data subject will ever find it.

From outside, that company is indistinguishable from one that never appointed anyone. An authority conducting a sweep sees the same absence. A buyer running due diligence reaches the same conclusion. A data subject looking for somewhere to write finds nothing and complains to their own authority, which is precisely the sequence Article 27 exists to prevent.

This is why we generate the wording at the moment the designation is issued, in every language the site publishes, rather than leaving it as an exercise. The mandate does no work until the text is live.

Questions about the wording

Where exactly does the representative go in the notice?

In the section identifying who you are, next to the controller's own identity and contact details. Article 13(1)(a) requires it where data is collected from the person; Article 14(1)(a) requires the same where the data was obtained elsewhere. Both wordings should be present.

Is naming the country enough?

No. The requirement is identity and contact details: a legal entity name, a postal address in a Member State, and a route to reach it. "Our representative in the EU" without a name satisfies neither article.

Do we have to publish it in every language?

The information must be provided in clear and plain language to the people it concerns. In practice that means every language in which you offer your service — the same set your privacy notice already exists in.

Can we put it in the cookie banner instead?

No. The banner deals with consent; the identity information belongs in the notice itself, reachable before or at the moment data is collected.

Our representative is named only in the DPA with clients. Is that enough?

Not for Articles 13 and 14, which are about informing data subjects, not counterparties. A processing agreement is not published and data subjects never see it.

Does the wording have to say "Article 27"?

It does not have to quote the article, but saying so removes ambiguity for authorities and buyers reading quickly. We generate wording that names the entity, the address and the role.

What if we change representative later?

The notice must be updated the same day the new designation takes effect. Until then it points people at an entity that no longer acts for you.

See what your notice says right now

We read your public privacy notice and tell you in ten seconds whether a representative is named, and whether the wording holds.

Run the free check
The designation from which the privacy notice wording is generated
The designation from which the privacy notice wording is generated