Article 27 UK GDPR · Brazil
UK representative for Brazilian companies
Brazil built the LGPD closely on the European model, which means Brazilian companies recognise this requirement immediately — from the other side. The LGPD asks foreign controllers to appoint a representative in Brazil. The UK GDPR asks the same of Brazilian controllers reaching people in Britain, and the symmetry is exact.
The LGPD is the mirror, not the answer
Article 5 of the LGPD requires a representative in Brazil for controllers established abroad. Article 27 of the UK GDPR requires one in Britain for controllers established abroad. Each rule protects its own territory, and complying with the Brazilian one tells the ICO nothing. A company caught by both needs two appointments, in two countries, naming two entities.
The ANPD and the ICO enforce separately
The Autoridade Nacional de Proteção de Dados supervises Brazilian processing. The Information Commissioner's Office supervises British matters and expects a representative with a British address. Neither authority acts for the other, and neither accepts a designation naming an entity in the other's territory.
Software and agribusiness, two different exposures
Brazilian software companies selling subscriptions to British users hold account data, usage records and payment identifiers, and their users exercise rights readily. Agribusiness and commodities exporters hold far less personal data but deal with British counterparties whose compliance teams ask about it in writing. The first group faces requests; the second faces questionnaires. Both need the same designation.
No adequacy, so the transfer question follows
The United Kingdom has not recognised Brazil as adequate. Data moving from Britain generally requires the IDTA or the addendum. It is a separate instrument from the designation and it arrives in the same conversation, usually within a week of the first.
O que publicar na política de privacidade
One paragraph naming an entity established in the United Kingdom, alongside whatever your LGPD text already says. We supply it in Portuguese and in English. If you also appointed a European representative, that is a third paragraph rather than a replacement: three territories, three named entities, each answering its own authority.
Two mirrored requirements
| LGPD Article 5 | Brazil | Foreign controllers appoint a representative in Brazil |
| UK GDPR Article 27 | United Kingdom | Foreign controllers appoint one in Britain |
| Enforcement | ANPD in Brazil, ICO in Britain | Neither acts for the other |
| Transfers UK → Brazil | No adequacy finding | IDTA or addendum required |
| EU GDPR Article 27 | Union | A third designation if you target the EU |
Assinaturas de software e o volume de pedidos
Brazilian software companies selling to British users meet this through volume rather than through a single incident. Subscription products generate account closures, refund disputes and deletion requests as a matter of routine, and each one is a request under the UK GDPR with a deadline attached. A representative turns that flow into something logged and forwarded rather than something discovered late.
Questions from Brazilian companies
We appointed a representative under the LGPD. Does that count?
No. That representative is in Brazil, for foreign controllers reaching Brazilians. Article 27 requires one established in the United Kingdom.
Is Brazil covered by a UK adequacy decision?
No. Transfers from the UK generally require the IDTA or the addendum to the standard clauses.
We sell only to British companies, not consumers.
The individuals at those companies are data subjects. Their contact details are personal data under the UK GDPR.
Podemos receber a redação em português?
Yes. The designation and certificate are issued in English; the wording for your privacy notice is supplied in Portuguese as well.
Appointed today, verifiable today
One annual fee, no charge per request. From €290 a year for the United Kingdom, €390 for the United Kingdom and the Union together.
How the UK service works PricingCompanies elsewhere, same obligation
What changes from one country to the next is not the rule but the route into it.
Selling into Britain from the United States
The same rule, a different starting point.
Selling into Britain from Turkey
The same rule, a different starting point.
Article 27 or Article 16
The guide that matters most here.